| SECT. VI OF BENEVOLENCE AND ANGER |
| Ideas may be compared to the extension and solidity of matter, and impressions, especially reflective ones, to colours, tastes, smells and other sensible qualities. |
| Ideas never admit of a total union, but are endowed with a kind of impenetrability, by which they exclude each other, and are capable of forming a compound by their conjunction, not by their mixture. |
| On the other hand, impressions and passions are susceptible of an entire union; and like colours, may be blended so perfectly together, that each of them may lose itself, and contribute only to vary that uniform impression, which arises from the whole. |
| Some of the most curious phaenomena of the human mind are derived from this property of the passions. |
| In examining those ingredients, which are capable of uniting with love and hatred, I begin to be sensible, in some measure, of a misfortune, that has attended every system of philosophy, with which the world has been yet acquainted. |
| It is commonly found, that in accounting for the operations of nature by any particular hypothesis; among a number of experiments, that quadrate exactly with the principles we would endeavour to establish; there is always some phaenomenon, which is more stubborn, and will not so easily bend to our purpose. |
| We need not be surprized, that this should happen in natural philosophy. |
| The essence and composition of external bodies are so obscure, that we must necessarily, in our reasonings, or rather conjectures concerning them, involve ourselves in contradictions and absurdities. |
| But as the perceptions of the mind are perfectly known, and I have used all imaginable caution in forming conclusions concerning them, I have always hoped to keep clear of those contradictions, which have attended every other system. |
| Accordingly the difficulty, which I have at present in my eye, is nowise contrary to my system; but only departs a little from that simplicity, which has been hitherto its principal force and beauty. |
| The passions of love and hatred are always followed by, or rather conjoined with benevolence and anger. |
| It is this conjunction, which chiefly distinguishes these affections from pride and humility. |
| For pride and humility are pure emotions in the soul, unattended with any desire, and not immediately exciting us to action. |
| But love and hatred are not compleated within themselves, nor rest in that emotion, which they produce, but carry the mind to something farther. |
| Love is always followed by a desire of the happiness of the person beloved, and an aversion to his misery: As hatred produces a desire of the misery and an aversion to the happiness of the person hated. |
| So remarkable a difference betwixt these two sets of passions of pride and humility, love and hatred, which in so many other particulars correspond to each other, merits our attention. |
| The conjunction of this desire and aversion with love and hatred may be accounted for by two different hypotheses. |
| The first is, that love and hatred have not only a cause, which excites them, viz, pleasure and pain; and an object, to which they are directed, viz, a person or thinking being; but likewise an end, which they endeavour to attain, viz, the happiness or misery of the person beloved or hated; all which views, mixing together, make only one passion. |
| According to this system, love is nothing but the desire of happiness to another person, and hatred that of misery. |
| The desire and aversion constitute the very nature of love and hatred. |